Subscribe to our Blog

Multi-echelon inventory optimization vs inventory optimization

By Jeff Bodenstab7 Aug 2018

Editor’s Note: Last year ToolsGroup became Microsoft’s partner for Multi-echelon Inventory Optimization (MEIO) in Industrial accounts. Microsoft and I collaborated on a blog introducing the basic concept of MEIO, comparing it with Inventory Optimization. You can see Microsoft’s version here on their and my slightly modified version below.

The subway system is the lifeblood of New York City, carrying an average of 5.7 million people per day across 472 stations. Each station is part of a larger system and operates on a set schedule under one management umbrella. Imagine what would happen if each station optimized its schedule and traffic independently: city-wide chaos would ensue. Now consider that by not optimizing your inventory from a global vantage point you may be creating, if not outright chaos, a much less efficient network than you could have.

There are many pieces of the modern manufacturing supply chain, and when it comes to inventory management, each one must operate as a part of a global single system to be most effective. To truly serve the end customer, all manufacturing echelons, such as raw materials suppliers, factories, distribution centers, and wholesalers, need to ensure that the right stock is at the right place at the right time. This is no easy task.

Making matters worse, many manufacturers are currently using legacy systems with rules of thumb, outdated algorithms, or personal instinct to manage inventory. For example, an organization may set inventory targets for a specific SKU-Location based on average demand for a broad product family across a wide geographic region. This approach does not account for variability: individual products may have a similar average demand but dramatically different incoming order patterns.

To stay competitive, manufacturers are turning to two types of solutions to handle their supply chain: inventory optimization (IO) and multi-echelon inventory optimization (MEIO). The overarching goal of both IO and MEIO solutions is to efficiently match inventory levels to accommodate forecasted demand. This enables manufacturers to keep inventory levels low, move inventory as quickly as possible, and ensure high service levels for customers. Let’s first look at how inventory optimization (IO) solutions tackle effective supply chain planning, then compare it with MEIO.

The basic approach to inventory optimization

A good inventory optimization solution utilizes identifies optimal inventory levels at individual stages in the supply chain. With advanced analytics, statistical algorithms, and sometimes machine learning, manufacturers can accurately address demand volatility and manage even slow-moving products in the long tail.

A linear supply chain

Inventory optimization models demand and determines appropriate inventory for individual echelons in the supply chain. For example, if a supply chain contains raw materials suppliers, factories, and warehouses, most inventory optimization solutions manage stock at each stage separately—optimizing supply at warehouses distinctly from factories. By bringing to bear statistical demand forecasting, advanced analytics, and intelligent inventory adjustments, manufacturers see significant improvements over the old rules of thumb, arbitrary segmentation, and one-size-fits-all approaches. The results are powerful and usually immediate: improved service levels, increased working capital, and decreased operational costs. These solutions greatly improve business outcomes and are an important first step to modernizing inventory management.

The Multi-echelon Approach

MEIO solutions take inventory optimization a step further for complex supply chains. An effective MEIO solution suggests the right levels of inventory at each stage of the supply chain by simultaneously optimizing inventory balance across multiple echelons and locations. Picking up from our previous example, with an MEIO approach, manufacturers would analyze demand forecasts across an all-encompassing view of the supply chain.

Multi-echelon Inventory Optimization

So how does this approach further help plan inventory? MEIO enables manufacturers to strategically stock individual inventories across all echelons of the supply chain, further increasing customer service levels while simultaneously decreasing costs. For instance, the MEIO software might suggest the right “decoupling points” and adequate levels of materials, components, subassemblies and finished goods in any location of the entire supply chain. It can optimize the balance of inventories across different locations for optimal “staging” and different Bill-of-Material (BOM) levels for optimal “postponement”. It also enables manufacturers to achieve the optimal replenishment frequency for individual products at each locations.

The increased visibility MEIO provides empowers centralized demand planning, reducing costs across the supply chain and streamlining operations. Inventory optimization (IO) is a great first step to improving overall supply chain performance, but for companies with complex supply chains, MEIO goes further towards optimized service levels with minimized inventory costs.

Five More Inventory Optimization Segments

Here are five more inventory optimization distinctions that you should be aware of if you are considering an optimization solution. Knowing which types are important to your business is an important step to determining which solution best fits your needs.

Inventory Configuration addresses the issue of in what form should I hold my inventory; as raw material, finished goods, or something in between?  Optimized inventory configuration is achieved via postponement strategy which optimizes the trade-off between upstream and downstream inventory to identify the most globally efficient balance. Positioning inventory downstream nearer demand is traded off against positioning inventory upstream, where it has the broadest range of possible uses.  In manufacturing operations, adequate levels of assemblies and finished goods are positioned to deliver the final product as late as possible within an acceptable service-time. Partially processed Bill-of-Material (BOM) inventory is positioned to gain higher commonality of raw material and components.  This risk pooling approach frequently requires less inventory. For example, postponing final labeling, packaging or kitting reduces inventory requirements because the same inventory can be satisfy multiple types of demand.

Stage Optimization applies the same postponement principles, but to the distribution network, where the form of the inventory usually does not change, only its place in the network. It addresses decisions about whether to stock inventory at the factory, in a centralized distribution center, at regional network, or some combination of the above. Downstream inventory downstream is closer to customer demand. But upstream inventory allows for risk pooling across as many regions, customers or channels (e.g., retail stores, eCommerce, etc.).

Mix Optimization (also called Service Optimization or Service Level Optimization) allows the business to position the inventory across the distribution network to meet high customer service level objectives in a much more efficient manner than simply creating a homogeneous mix of “one size fits all” inventory. Instead, mix optimization creates a blend of different service level targets for each individual SKU in each location to achieve an aggregated service level target that meets the marketing/business objectives. For instance, instead of assigning all SKUs in a class a 98% service level, a global 98% target is achieved by optimally setting individual SKUs service levels at 95%, 97%, 99.5%, etc., achieving the same overall objective with far less inventory expense.

Lot Size Optimization is the simultaneous optimization of safety stock versus cycle stock values. Optimal lot sizes are a function of the targeted service levels, safety stocks, set-up cost (for manufacturing) or the handling cost (for replenishment) versus the inventory holding cost and other factors. As the lot size increases, set-up or handling costs decrease while the stock holding cost increases in line with average stock level (but not linearly, as is used in most classic models).

Prebuild Optimization (also called Build Ahead Optimization) is used in two cases. The first case is a finite supply capacity environment with strong seasonal demand or reduced supply due to shut-down or maintenance. The prebuilt inventory should be carefully planned to cover the excess demand in the period of inadequate supply. Inventory optimization dynamically defines the prebuilt inventory requirements on the basis of the updated time-phased forecasts and supply capacity until the end of the season. The inventory mix covers the excess demand during the season without losing sales or accumulating overstocks of wrong inventories. Prebuild analysis may be an important component of Sales and Operations Planning (S&OP).

The second case occurs towards end of product life when companies define an end of production date. Service parts for such products should be prebuilt to guarantee service for a period defined by an SLA, company policy or by law. Similar to above, based on the residual supply capacity and the evolving forecast for such parts in the above period, prebuilt inventory requirements should be dynamically calculated to minimize obsolescence or resupply (after end of production).

Click here or below to see a Microsoft AppSource demo of the ToolsGroup MEIO solution built on Microsoft Cloud technology.

Subscribe to our Blog
Supply Chain Brief